What We Do

Quality Assurance and Testing

Shipping fast means nothing if the product breaks. We test thoroughly so your users get software that actually works.

There is a reason "it works on my machine" is a joke in software development. The gap between code that passes a developer's quick check and code that works reliably for real users in production is larger than most people think. Different browsers, different screen sizes, different data sets, edge cases nobody thought of. Quality assurance is what closes that gap.

At Conimex IT, QA is not a phase that happens at the end of development. It is part of how we build software from day one. Every feature we develop goes through a combination of automated tests, manual testing, and code review before it reaches production. This is not optional and it is not something we skip when deadlines get tight.

How QA fits into our development process

Every pull request triggers automated tests before the code can be merged. We write unit tests for business logic, integration tests for API endpoints, and feature tests that simulate real user workflows. On the PHP side, we use PHPUnit and Pest. On the React frontend, we use Jest and React Testing Library. This automated layer catches regressions quickly and gives us confidence that new code does not break existing functionality.

But automated tests only cover the scenarios you think to write tests for. That is why we also do manual exploratory testing on every feature before it ships. A real person uses the feature the way a real user would, trying edge cases, unexpected inputs, and unusual workflows that automated tests might miss. This catches usability issues, visual glitches, and logic problems that are hard to express in code.

We also do cross-browser and cross-device testing for web applications, and platform-specific testing for React Native mobile apps. A form that works perfectly on Chrome might behave differently on Safari. A layout that looks right on an iPhone might break on an older Android device. We catch these issues before your users do.

QA as a standalone service

While QA is built into every project we deliver, we also offer testing services for teams that have their own developers but need dedicated QA support.

If your team is shipping features without proper testing, or if bugs keep reaching production and you do not have the bandwidth to test thoroughly, we can step in. We review your application, set up a testing strategy, and provide ongoing QA coverage. This can include writing automated test suites for an existing codebase that lacks tests, performing manual testing cycles before each release, setting up CI pipelines that run tests automatically, and doing regression testing after major updates.

This works well for companies that have a development team but no dedicated QA person. Instead of hiring and training someone full-time, you get experienced testers who can start contributing immediately.

What we test for

Functional testing is the foundation. Does the feature do what it is supposed to do? Do all the user flows work end to end? Do edge cases produce the right results instead of errors?

Beyond that, we test for performance. Does the page load in a reasonable time? Do API endpoints respond quickly under load? Are there database queries that slow down as the dataset grows?

Security testing is also part of our process. We check for common vulnerabilities like SQL injection, cross-site scripting, insecure authentication flows, and exposed API endpoints. We do not replace a full security audit, but we catch the most common problems before they become real risks.

Accessibility testing rounds out our approach. We verify that the application works with keyboard navigation, that screen readers can interpret the content, and that color contrast meets WCAG guidelines.

The cost of skipping QA

Every bug that reaches production costs more to fix than one caught during development. The developer has to context-switch, reproduce the issue, write a fix, test it, and deploy it. Meanwhile, users are frustrated and your team is firefighting instead of building new features.

Investing in QA upfront is not a luxury. It is the most practical way to ship faster in the long run, because you spend less time fixing things that should have been caught earlier.